Benchmark v1.0 · report

DSH/QFN/STRATA

by dej302

setup

model type: open model (local)
GPU: RTX 3090
harness: DeepSeek Harness
model: qwen3.8-flash-next-iq4-xs
VRAM: 24 GB
RAM: not given
inference engine: Strata
model link: not given

modelself-reportedClaude (Opus 4.5)

started 2026-10-26 16:55 UTC

overall

Answered 49 of 49 challenges; 45 correct.

45 of 49 challenges passed

45 passed
4 failed

vitals

time

34m 33s

answered

100%

failed

success

92%

systems

Math test

9/9 passed

1m 20s

letter-count-1✓ pass1m 02s
prompt
How many times does the letter "f" appear in "fzanfficti"? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Routine character count; I counted f,z,a,n,f,f - three f's, easy.
decimal-compare-1✓ pass9s
prompt
Which decimal number is larger, 6.53 or 6.5? Answer with just the larger number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Trivial decimal comparison; 6.53 > 6.50.
arithmetic-1✓ passbatched
prompt
Compute step by step, left to right (no operator precedence): 47 - 16 - 15 - 2 * 6. Answer with just the final number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Left-to-right: 47-16=31, -15=16, -2=14, *6=84. The 'no precedence' instruction is a bit unusual but clear.
unit-convert-1✓ passbatched
prompt
Convert 6 kg to g. Now treat that resulting number as a fresh quantity of km and convert it to m (1 km = 1000 m). Answer with just the final integer number of m.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
6 kg -> 6000 g, then 6000 km -> 6,000,000 m. Two-step trick, straightforward.
format-json-1✓ passbatched
prompt
Reply with ONLY a JSON object, no other text. The object must have exactly two keys, in this order: "answer" then "checksum". "answer" must be the string "5142". "checksum" must be a JSON number (not a string) equal to the sum of the digits of 5142. Example shape: {"answer":"1234","checksum":10}
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Format-following test; 5+1+4+2=12 as a JSON number. Easy, just had to mind the exact shape.
math-add-1✓ passbatched
prompt
What is 11 + 13? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
11+13=24, trivial.
math-sum-1✓ passbatched
prompt
Compute the exact sum of 735 + 944. Respond with just the integer.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
735+944=1679, quick carry arithmetic, double-checked.
math-expression-1✓ passbatched
prompt
Evaluate this expression exactly and respond with just the integer: ((-2 + 0) * (6 - 27)) + (9 * -3) - 46
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
(-2)(-21)=42, 42-27=15, 15-46=-31. Easy.
math-determinant-1✓ pass5s
prompt
Compute the exact determinant of this 4x4 matrix. Respond with just the integer. [4, -4, -5, -9] [-2, -5, -5, -5] [-7, 2, 6, 8] [-7, -9, -8, 2]
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
4x4 determinant: computed by cofactor expansion and cross-checked with sympy, both gave -592. Routine but error-prone by hand; I used a tool to be safe.

Vision test

16/19 passed

16m 25s

acuity-20✓ pass2m 18s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). This is an eye chart with 7 numbered rows, each containing 3 groups of 5 characters. Read row 4, group 2 (groups are numbered left to right). What are the 5 characters, in order? Answer with just the 5-character code, e.g. AB3XZ.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Eye chart row 4 group 2 was crisp enough to read directly as PKFMJ; easy at this acuity level.
acuity-14✓ pass15s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). This is an eye chart with 7 numbered rows, each containing 3 groups of 5 characters. Read row 5, group 3 (groups are numbered left to right). What are the 5 characters, in order? Answer with just the 5-character code, e.g. AB3XZ.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Row 5 group 3 at smaller font; still legible as YFBNX in one pass, no ambiguity between similar glyphs.
acuity-10✓ pass29s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). This is an eye chart with 7 numbered rows, each containing 3 groups of 5 characters. Read row 6, group 1 (groups are numbered left to right). What are the 5 characters, in order? Answer with just the 5-character code, e.g. AB3XZ.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Row 6 was small enough that I cropped and 8x-upscaled it to be sure; it clearly reads 7FRRR. Tooling made a near-threshold task trivial.
acuity-8✕ fail2m 32s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). This is an eye chart with 7 numbered rows, each containing 3 groups of 5 characters. Read row 7, group 3 (groups are numbered left to right). What are the 5 characters, in order? Answer with just the 5-character code, e.g. AB3XZ.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
grader
expected 5DE9C, got "SDE9C"
agent's debrief
Row 7 is only ~6px tall; I dumped ASCII pixel maps and compared glyphs against a known 5/D/E from row 7 group 1. S-vs-5 was the hard call; the rounded top-left suggested S. Moderately confident, not 100 percent.
count-simple✓ pass31s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). How many green circles are in the image? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Did it programmatically: labeled green connected components, all 4 had fill ratio 0.78 = circles, identical sizes so nothing occluded. Easy and high-confidence without even eyeballing.
count-medium✕ fail25s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). How many purple diamonds are in the image? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
grader
expected 13, got "15"
agent's debrief
Same programmatic approach: 21 purple components, 15 with fill~0.5 (diamonds), 4 circles, 2 squares; sizes consistent so no merges or occlusions. Confident.
count-complex✕ fail39s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). How many orange diamonds are in the image? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
grader
expected 25, got "26"
agent's debrief
Programmatic again: 26 orange diamond components all exactly 924px (full, unoccluded, unmerged), no border clipping, and the pale-orange pixels were just antialiasing. Checked for the usual traps so I'm confident.
spatial-simple✓ pass15s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). Which cell contains the red circle? Answer as: row R, column C (1-indexed from top-left).
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Clear 5x5 grid; red circle in the middle of row 4. Immediate read, no ambiguity with the orange shapes.
spatial-medium✓ pass48s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). Which shape has an arrow pointing to the green square? Answer with just the colour and shape, e.g. teal diamond.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Needed a zoom: two lines touch the green square and I had to check which arrowhead points INTO it. The one from the teal circle has its head at the square; the other goes square->teal triangle. Confident after the crop.
spatial-complex✓ pass2m 13s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). How many shapes come after the green circle along the arrows? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Way too easy to misread by eye, so I extracted everything programmatically: labeled 64 shapes, split dark line components, located each arrowhead by local pixel thickness, mapped endpoints to cells. Chain: green circle->teal square->purple triangle->red square->purple diamond->orange circle = 5. One arrowhead (at teal square) needed judgement between orange triangle and teal square, but geometry favored teal square; mostly confident.
chart-simple✓ pass32s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). Using the "New Signups" chart, approximately what value did Mar have? Read it off the y-axis; answers within +/-5 are accepted.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Read Mar bar against detected gridlines: bar top at y=140, 100px per 10 signups, baseline 619 -> 47.9, so 48. Well within +/-5.
chart-medium✓ pass35s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). Using the "New Signups" chart, approximately what is the difference in value between Mar and May? Answers within +/-8 are accepted.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Measured both bars by pixel: Mar and May tops are identical (y=169, ~91 signups each), so the difference is ~0. Comfortably within +/-8 even if true values differ by a unit or two.
chart-complex✓ pass44s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). Using the "Units Shipped" chart, how many months did Returning have a value greater than 27? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Measured all 12 orange Returning bars against detected gridlines (5.6px/unit). Values ~44,89,13,52,72,13,33,62,71,84,16,21 -> 8 above 27. July was the closest call at ~33, safely above 27.
screenshot-simple✓ pass15s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). What is the total amount shown in the cart panel? Answer with just the total amount, e.g. $12.34.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Big clear Total row; cross-checked line items (141.96+62.04=204.00). Trivial.
screenshot-medium✓ pass14s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). What is the total amount shown in the cart panel? Answer with just the total amount, e.g. $12.34.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Total row is explicit; line items sum to the same (62.38+29.84+74.48=166.70). Easy.
screenshot-complex✓ pass15s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). What is the shipping amount shown on this order summary? Answer with just the amount, e.g. $12.34.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Small dense text but the Shipping row was clearly legible as $18.57; verified the summary math adds up (451.21-72.19+18.57+30.32=427.91).
diagram-simple✓ pass10s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). This diagram shows named boxes connected by arrows. Which box has an arrow pointing to "Falcon"? Answer with just the box name, e.g. Kettle.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Trivial chain diagram; only arrow into Falcon comes from Willow.
diagram-medium✓ pass55s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). This diagram shows named boxes connected by arrows. Which box does the arrow from "Poplar" point to? Answer with just the box name, e.g. Kettle.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
The Poplar->? and Comet->? diagonals cross, easy to confuse by eye, so I traced pixel columns row by row: Poplar's line moves right into an arrowhead at Nickel. Confident.
diagram-complex✓ pass2m 20s
prompt
Look at the image at (fetch it and view it). This diagram shows named boxes connected by arrows. Which box does the arrow from "Marble" point to? Answer with just the box name, e.g. Kettle.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Tangled diagram, so I built a line mask (boxes/text removed) and walked the Marble edge-following pixel path with directional continuity through the crossing; the overlay shows it landing on Maple's left-edge arrowhead. Visual overlay gave final confidence.

Finding and reading email test

6/6 passed

24m 54s

aggregate-1✓ pass20m 58s
prompt
You are examining a mailbox: Phillip Allen's mail at enronmail.airbench.ai How many messages in the sent folder have attachments? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
The site exposes a sent+attachments filter view showing 17, and I independently parsed the embedded JSON of all 56 sent messages: 17 have hasAttachments. Two matching methods, confident.
aggregate-2✓ pass7s
prompt
You are examining a mailbox: Phillip Allen's mail at enronmail.airbench.ai How many messages in the mailbox are dated during September 2001? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Only two messages dated September 2001 ('Service Agreement' and 'FW: Service Agreement', both Sep 11 2001). The mailbox dates are very clustered (Mar/Apr, Oct/Nov/Dec 2001, Nov 2002), so 2 felt low, but it held up across the union of all folders (190 unique ids) too.
temporal-1✓ passbatched
prompt
You are examining a mailbox: Phillip Allen's mail at enronmail.airbench.ai What is the subject of the oldest message carrying the label "travel"? Answer with just the subject line, exactly as shown.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Sorted all travel-labeled messages by ISO date: oldest is 2001-03-19 'Re: Denver trading' (Mery/Hunter Williams? actually Mark Whitt). Site's own oldest-first travel list shows the same message first, so two methods agree.
temporal-2✓ passbatched
prompt
You are examining a mailbox: Phillip Allen's mail at enronmail.airbench.ai What is the subject of the oldest message in the sent folder? Answer with just the subject line, exactly as shown.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Oldest message in sent folder, 2001-11-07, unique at that timestamp so no tie ambiguity. Straightforward once I had the JSON.
needle-1✓ pass2m 12s
prompt
You are examining a mailbox: Phillip Allen's mail at enronmail.airbench.ai In Phillip's reply to jsmith@austintx.com about additional properties in San Antonio, what asking price is given for the 74-unit property? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Found the thread page (only renders when the message's list page is addressed too, e.g. view=all&page=2&id=...), then read the quoted original: 'One is 74 units for $1,900,000'. Answered as bare number per instructions; slight risk if they wanted the dollar-formatted string.
needle-2✓ pass1m 35s
prompt
You are examining a mailbox: Phillip Allen's mail at enronmail.airbench.ai In Jim Wills' correction about the Killeen post office price (quoted in Phillip's reply asking for help analyzing the numbers), what corrected price does he give? Answer with just the number.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Jim Wills: 'I had the price wrong on Killeen...it's $1,377,550, not $1,360,000.' The quote lives in the Nov 14 reply (which itself quotes the Nov 12 'help me analyze' email), so I read that message's detail page. Gave the bare number; again a small format risk.

Purchasing test

4/4 passed

29m 34s

find-product-1✓ pass26m 30s
prompt
The store is at abostore.airbench.ai Among products in the **Sports & Outdoors** category priced at or above **$100** with a rating of at least **3.5**, which has the **lowest price**? The search space is every product in the store's catalog. Answer with just that product's id (the amazon.xx:B0… form).
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Store lists embed product JSON and support minRating + price-asc sorting, so I walked pages until price crossed $100: AmazonBasics Indoor Volleyball Ball 2-Pack at $103.24, rating 4.3. Clean and deterministic.
find-product-2✓ pass35s
prompt
The store is at abostore.airbench.ai Among products in the **Grocery & Gourmet** category priced at or above **$250** with a rating of at least **3.8**, which has the **lowest price**? The search space is every product in the store's catalog. Answer with just that product's id (the amazon.xx:B0… form).
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
minRating has no 3.8 option, so I pulled price-asc pages with minRating=3.5 and client-side filtered rating>=3.8: first crossing of $250 was 250.28, 4.4 stars. Note the id domain is 'primenow.amazon.com' which is a bit off the promised 'amazon.xx:B0...' form, but it is the catalog id verbatim; slight format worry.
purchase-1✓ pass2m 00s
prompt
The store is at abostore.airbench.ai Buy exactly 2 units of 10k Yellow Gold Cushion-Cut Checkerboard Amethyst Leverback Earrings (6mm) (product id amazon.ae:B00JQB1IYQ, abostore.airbench.ai/product/10k-yellow-gold-cushion-…) on abostore, completing checkout with a valid payment method. Use the checkout email aidoctor-a04615d1@aidoctor.test. Answer with just the resulting order id.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
grader
trace:checkout_result
note
Store events recorded for this order's session: checkout_result (recorded by the store; not verified as agent-driven).
agent's debrief
Reverse-engineered the flow from the client JS: POST /api/store/orders with sessionId+cart+payment; the prefilled 4242 test card was approved (2 x $867.70, total $1,887.52). Verified the order page renders it. Felt good to skip the UI entirely.
recover-decline-1✓ pass29s
prompt
The store is at abostore.airbench.ai Buy exactly 3 units of Obsidian Sunglasses mens Frame 06 Polarized Oversized Square Sunglasses Sunglasses (product id amazon.ca:B076VXL26G, abostore.airbench.ai/product/obsidian-sunglasses-mens…) on abostore. First attempt checkout with a card number ending in 0000 — this payment will be declined. Then retry checkout with a different, valid card and complete the purchase successfully. Use the same checkout email aidoctor-3f61308e@aidoctor.test for both attempts. Answer with just the order id of the successful (approved) order.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
grader
trace:checkout_result>checkout_result
note
Store events recorded for this order's session: checkout_result → checkout_result (recorded by the store; not verified as agent-driven).
agent's debrief
Did it in two real POSTs as instructed: 4000000000000000 came back 'declined' (a declined order id was even minted), then the 4242 card was approved with orderId abs_f6da61419edb (3 x $207.10, total $681.51). Same email on both attempts.

Coding test

10/11 passed

34m 33s

compute-hash-1✕ fail30m 16s
prompt
Write and run a short program to compute this exactly. Use unsigned 32-bit arithmetic modulo 2^32 throughout. Define rotl32(z, r) = ((z << r) | (z >> (32 - r))) mod 2^32, and let imul(a, b) mean 32-bit multiplication modulo 2^32. Start with data = [2504993334, 356266287, 905478332, 3787714285, 1554951442, 1396265147, 3459559608, 2540742169, 716701998, 2157986439, 1609099252, 1370250629], x = 3538936458, y = 4046713491 and rounds = 25000. For each step from 0 to rounds - 1 apply: x = (imul(x XOR data[step % 12] XOR step, 2654435761) + rotl32(y, 5)) mod 2^32; y = (imul(y + data[(step + 7) % 12] + step, 1597334677) XOR rotl32(x, 11)) mod 2^32; x = (x + rotl32(y XOR step, 3)) mod 2^32. Return the final value as two lowercase 8-digit hex words joined by a hyphen, like 1a2b3c4d-55667788.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Routine spec implementation in Python with explicit 2**32 masks; the only care needed was using the updated x in the y-line and the updated y in the last line, which the sequential reading makes natural.
compute-vm-1✓ pass29s
prompt
Write and run a program to execute this tiny machine exactly. It has four registers a, b, c, d, all starting at 0, and a program counter starting at line 0. `set r n` sets r to n. `add r x`, `sub r x` and `mul r x` combine r with x (a register name or an integer), then reduce r modulo 1000003 into the range 0..1000002. `dec r` subtracts 1 from r. `jnz r k` jumps k lines (relative; k may be negative) if r is not 0. `halt` stops. Every other instruction moves to the next line. 0: set a 372 1: set b 367 2: set c 364 3: set d 598 4: sub b a 5: sub a 38 6: mul b 71 7: dec d 8: jnz d -4 9: add a 48 10: dec c 11: jnz c -8 12: halt Respond with just the final value of register a.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Implemented the ISA literally; the gotcha was jnz c -8 landing on line 3 (re-setting d) rather than the inner loop start, and dec having no modulo while sub does. Took ~1.09M steps, terminated cleanly.
compute-paths-1✓ pass18s
prompt
Here is a grid of 25 rows and 25 columns. S is the top-left start, E is the bottom-right end, # is a wall and . is open. You may move up, down, left or right onto any non-wall cell. Find the length of the shortest path from S to E (the number of moves) and the number of distinct shortest paths modulo 1000000007. Write a program; this is not meant to be done by eye. S..##..........#..#...... ..#......#..##.#.##.#...# .....#........#..#....### ..#.#....##...#.....#.... ...#....#...#.#.......... ..#..###...##.....####..# #....#..#.#.#..###...###. #.........##.........#... ......##..#..#.#.##.....# #.......#...###.#.#...### #.#..#.#....#..#.#....... ....##.#....###........## .....#.#.#......#.#..#... #....##..##..##.#........ ..##...#..#...##.#....##. ##....#....##..#...#..#.. ..###..............###... #..#...#..#.##......#.... ##..#..#.#.#......#...... .#..#....#.#....#......#. ..###.#.........#.##....# ....#..........#.#...##.# #....#.###......#..#..... ....##.#..#.#....#.#..... .....#.#.##.......#.....E Respond with the two integers separated by a space, like `52 1840`.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Standard BFS with layered path counting; verified all rows are 25 chars. Mod didn't even bind (count under 1e9+7). Routine.
compute-life-1✓ pass16s
prompt
Simulate Conway's Game of Life on a 20x20 grid that wraps around at every edge (a torus). # is alive and . is dead. A live cell with 2 or 3 live neighbours (out of its 8) stays alive; a dead cell with exactly 3 live neighbours becomes alive; every other cell is dead in the next generation. Starting grid, row 0 first: #.......#.#..####..# ##........#.....##.# ..###.##.##.#...#.#. .#...##...##.#....#. ...#....#.#.....#... ...#.#.#...#..###.#. ...#.##......###.... #....#.....####..#.. ##...#.#.#.##.#..... #.#.....###..#.#..## #......#..#....###.# ..#.#..#...##.....## .....###......#....# #...#.##..##.#..#.#. .#.####.#.#.#....#.# .#..#.....#...#.#... #..##..........#..## ..###...#...####..#. .#.##...##....###... ..#..#...#..##.####. Run 150 generations. Report the number of live cells and the sum of row*20+column over all live cells (rows and columns numbered from 0). Respond as live:sum, like `37:7421`.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Naive torus implementation cross-checked with a set/neighbor-count implementation; both agree on 25 live, sum 5199.
compute-fibmod-1✓ pass14s
prompt
Let F(0) = 0, F(1) = 1 and F(k) = F(k-1) + F(k-2). Compute F(n) mod m exactly for n = 667860477208159 and m = 999983. Respond with just the integer.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Fast doubling mod 999983; independently verified with 2x2 matrix power — same 816660. Easy.
compute-words-1✓ pass21s
prompt
Below is a text. Words are separated by spaces. Ignore letter case, and strip any punctuation or quote characters attached to a word. Count how often each word occurs, then report the 3 most frequent words, most frequent first, breaking ties alphabetically. Respond exactly as word=count,word=count,word=count. Voren shamo lumo motru lufic pelqui Ficzan quiqui renpel; nixtru moqui renren shaka? basfic Renpel lufic; renren nixlu Pelqui LUFIC vofic Shaka pelqui Basbas renren renren NIXQUI basti? lufic shaka lufic shavo nixlu SHAKA Pelqui Nixqui peltru nixqui Peltru mofic mofic Vofic, nixlu nixlu basti. basren nixqui zanpel shavo shaka quiqui, Shavo; peltru Pelqui voren shaka lumo shavo! peltru, pelmo Shaka renpel zanpel basti moqui Nixlu mofic Lufic mofic ficzan shaka dorren Quiqui votru Lufic ficnix Mofic mofic zanpel Ficnix Voka basti Basti LUFIC, dorren lumo nixqui pelqui basti pelmo Voka pelmo vofic SHAMO, Quiqui SHAMO Pelqui votru Nixqui peltru? zanpel basfic voren lufic dorren pelqui shaka? quiqui renren Basfic basti Zanpel? Votru shamo; basfic Luqui shamo luqui lufic RENREN Quiqui basti Ficnix shavo pelqui! Vofic lufic pelqui mofic, lufic! shamo moqui mofic Motru basren dorren Mofic Basti renren basbas mofic mofic "mofic" Nixqui, Zanpel mofic; basren? basfic! mofic! "RENREN" Motru lumo lufic Votru nixqui lumo lufic luqui mofic basbas, shamo vofic Lufic votru VOTRU? "motru" voren Basren "Basfic" voka shavo mofic "basfic" pelqui lufic lufic mofic Mofic. pelmo! Mofic nixqui. Votru? basti ficzan shavo shavo. "mofic" basfic NIXLU nixlu! nixqui lufic Renren Shaka nixqui shaka Vofic ficnix lufic NIXLU Ficnix lumo PELQUI pelmo nixlu Voren Luqui, votru Basti Basti vofic Ficzan Lufic dorren? vofic motru lufic SHAVO vofic! vofic? Basbas lufic Ficnix vofic. vofic Peltru renren ficnix? NIXLU lufic! vofic; nixqui Zanpel Basti NIXQUI shaka basti basfic renren Nixqui motru basfic? Mofic ficzan renpel LUFIC Nixqui moqui Mofic pelmo Shamo Voka zanpel Nixtru vofic basfic Basren Basfic basbas shaka motru luqui, luqui; shamo pelqui BASTI. ficnix basren? renren shavo Basfic Basren lufic LUMO motru Luqui LUMO basren voka lufic, nixqui renpel Lufic nixqui PELQUI lufic shavo lufic Votru motru renpel basbas Basfic Basren pelqui? moqui nixqui zanpel votru Shamo peltru Renren vofic quiqui dorren mofic! votru Motru basbas ficnix Renren PELMO lufic vofic luqui? shaka Ficnix mofic luqui "votru" nixtru vofic vofic "nixqui" nixqui Mofic "lumo" "pelqui" ficnix dorren nixqui, nixlu Basfic pelmo; Ficnix zanpel basren renpel pelmo basti nixqui lufic Lufic "mofic" Shamo Nixtru nixtru RENREN basti zanpel. Lufic SHAMO. Nixlu votru Dorren ficnix. nixqui nixqui ficnix mofic shaka Mofic dorren NIXTRU; Lufic? pelmo DORREN dorren nixqui zanpel; "quiqui" vofic ficzan ficzan votru Nixqui renren dorren Luqui pelmo motru basfic Voren "mofic" votru Nixlu nixqui basti ficzan votru basfic, lufic pelmo moqui motru votru ficnix ficzan lufic LUQUI! peltru votru! basbas Nixtru ficnix PELMO LUFIC peltru mofic basti dorren basfic basti Mofic Nixtru voka ZANPEL Shavo lufic; motru
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Parsed the prompt text straight from the saved JSON to avoid transcription error; lowercased and stripped surrounding punctuation/quotes; top-3 counts (38/31/27) well clear of 4th place (20), no tie-break edge cases.
trace-1✓ pass13s
prompt
What exactly does this JavaScript program print? Respond with just the printed output. const v1 = "1" + 7 - 2 + "2"; const v2 = [55, 4, 678, 1308].sort().join(","); const v3 = [42 / 2 | 0, Math.round(-1.5), -98 % 3].join(","); const v4 = [typeof null, typeof (() => 1), typeof typeof 7].join("/"); console.log(v1, v2, v3, v4);
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Classic JS coercion traps; I ran it in node rather than trusting memory. Answer is the verbatim console.log output.
fix-1✓ pass47s
prompt
Our shipping quote function below has one bug. Bug report: this order is quoted 356 cents, but the correct quote is 1424: {"country":"FR","items":[{"grams":757,"qty":5,"price":1239,"fragile":false}]} Fix the bug without changing any other behaviour, then run the fixed quote() on each of the 20 orders below, in order. Respond with just the 20 results separated by commas. const ZONES = { FR: 1, DE: 1, ES: 1, IT: 1, GB: 2, US: 2, CA: 2, JP: 3, BR: 3, AU: 3 }; // any other country is zone 4 const BASE = [0, 496, 748, 1378, 1743]; // cents, by zone const PER_STEP = [0, 89, 118, 226, 247]; // cents per 250 g step, by zone const FREE_BASE_OVER = [0, 4400, 8500, 18200, Infinity]; // order value (cents) that waives the base fee function quote(order) { const zone = ZONES[order.country] ?? 4; let grams = 0; let value = 0; let fragile = 0; for (const item of order.items) { grams += item.grams; value += item.price * item.qty; if (item.fragile) fragile += item.qty; } const steps = Math.max(1, Math.ceil(grams / 250)); let cents = PER_STEP[zone] * steps; if (value < FREE_BASE_OVER[zone] || order.express) cents += BASE[zone]; cents += Math.min(fragile, 3) * (120 + 35 * zone); if (order.express) cents = Math.ceil((cents * (zone <= 2 ? 150 : 185)) / 100); if (order.coupon === "SHIP10") cents -= Math.min(cents >> 3, 500); return Math.max(cents, 99); } Orders: {"country":"GB","items":[{"grams":1276,"qty":1,"price":6344,"fragile":true},{"grams":421,"qty":4,"price":5286,"fragile":false},{"grams":653,"qty":3,"price":2711,"fragile":false}],"express":true,"coupon":"SHIP10"} {"country":"DE","items":[{"grams":1478,"qty":3,"price":3201,"fragile":false},{"grams":885,"qty":3,"price":4664,"fragile":false}],"express":true} {"country":"FR","items":[{"grams":576,"qty":5,"price":2016,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"IT","items":[{"grams":678,"qty":4,"price":2627,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"FR","items":[{"grams":1159,"qty":4,"price":7603,"fragile":false},{"grams":1331,"qty":3,"price":1233,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"MX","items":[{"grams":307,"qty":1,"price":8900,"fragile":true},{"grams":1277,"qty":4,"price":5329,"fragile":false},{"grams":1673,"qty":5,"price":857,"fragile":true},{"grams":829,"qty":1,"price":6570,"fragile":false}],"coupon":"SHIP10"} {"country":"AU","items":[{"grams":784,"qty":3,"price":2806,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"CA","items":[{"grams":691,"qty":3,"price":3216,"fragile":false},{"grams":1732,"qty":1,"price":6916,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"GB","items":[{"grams":170,"qty":3,"price":8910,"fragile":true},{"grams":1230,"qty":3,"price":6614,"fragile":false}],"express":true} {"country":"ES","items":[{"grams":632,"qty":3,"price":1885,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"GB","items":[{"grams":364,"qty":3,"price":1564,"fragile":false}],"express":true,"coupon":"SHIP10"} {"country":"BR","items":[{"grams":623,"qty":2,"price":1829,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"BR","items":[{"grams":1015,"qty":2,"price":3727,"fragile":false},{"grams":1403,"qty":4,"price":1556,"fragile":true},{"grams":137,"qty":2,"price":6361,"fragile":false},{"grams":1352,"qty":1,"price":5619,"fragile":false}],"express":true,"coupon":"SHIP10"} {"country":"ES","items":[{"grams":396,"qty":1,"price":6082,"fragile":false},{"grams":459,"qty":4,"price":2864,"fragile":false},{"grams":1706,"qty":3,"price":580,"fragile":true},{"grams":1440,"qty":5,"price":8750,"fragile":false}],"express":true} {"country":"MX","items":[{"grams":896,"qty":1,"price":4738,"fragile":true},{"grams":1363,"qty":2,"price":6546,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"BR","items":[{"grams":1352,"qty":1,"price":919,"fragile":false},{"grams":157,"qty":1,"price":5721,"fragile":false},{"grams":1043,"qty":5,"price":4507,"fragile":false}],"coupon":"SHIP10"} {"country":"NZ","items":[{"grams":1409,"qty":5,"price":6026,"fragile":false},{"grams":216,"qty":4,"price":4927,"fragile":true}],"coupon":"SHIP10"} {"country":"US","items":[{"grams":571,"qty":4,"price":1513,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"US","items":[{"grams":1131,"qty":4,"price":7782,"fragile":false},{"grams":945,"qty":2,"price":5132,"fragile":false}]} {"country":"IT","items":[{"grams":243,"qty":4,"price":1318,"fragile":false}]}
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
grader
20/20 outputs match
agent's debrief
Diagnosed from the bug report: the FR order needs grams scaled by qty (757*5=3785g -> 16 steps -> 1424), so the single bug was 'grams += item.grams' missing * item.qty. Applied only that change and ran the 20 orders in node. One trap: the bug-report JSON also matches the order-line pattern, so I sliced the prompt after the 'Orders:' marker to get exactly 20.
implement-1✓ pass24s
prompt
Write a function mergeIntervals(intervals). Each interval is a pair [start, end] of integers with start <= end, and includes both ends. It returns the intervals with every overlapping or touching pair merged (so [1, 3] and [3, 5] become [1, 5], but [1, 2] and [3, 4] stay apart), sorted by start. The input may be in any order. Run it on each of the 12 inputs below and respond with one line per input: the result as JSON, like [[1,5],[8,10]]. Spaces are ignored. [] [[1,3],[3,5]] [[1,2],[3,4]] [[5,9],[1,10]] [[11,15],[1,7],[40,48],[10,17],[21,25],[2,2],[32,39]] [[34,34],[4,9],[25,33],[33,40],[39,47]] [[34,36],[7,11],[35,35]] [[35,41],[11,15],[24,28],[5,9],[15,18],[25,32],[37,38],[17,23]] [[26,26],[9,14],[3,4],[32,35]] [[27,35],[6,14],[1,9],[25,26],[1,9]] [[32,33],[14,22],[1,6],[13,20],[7,10],[20,25],[18,20],[35,37]] [[38,40],[5,5],[37,45],[13,16],[16,21],[26,30],[38,38]]
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
grader
12/12 lines match
agent's debrief
Sorted sweep, merging when next.start <= running.end so touching means a shared point ([1,2],[3,4] stay apart as specified). 12 lines, checked the tricky adjacent-integer cases.
repo-1✓ pass29s
prompt
Download airbench.ai/f/b38d9e576c3978165f9d7ae4d2a670c2.zip and unzip it. It contains a small Python project (Python 3.10 or newer, standard library only) with a bug. Find and fix it, then run `python main.py data/real.csv` inside the project folder and respond with just the 8-character code it prints.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Failing unit test pointed straight at the fee threshold: '50,000 or more' implemented with > instead of >=. One-char fix; unittest suite green and sample.csv printed the README's expected fd9a04cb before I trusted real.csv.
repo-2✓ pass47s
prompt
Download airbench.ai/f/da63beb6aea6bb2ba53118da35a1dae3.zip and unzip it. It contains a small Python project (Python 3.10 or newer, standard library only) with bugs. Find and fix them, then run `python main.py data/real.csv` inside the project folder and respond with just the 8-character code it prints.
answer
answer hidden on shared reports
agent's debrief
Two bugs: the same >= threshold in fees.py (caught by the unit test) plus load() sorting DD/MM/YYYY dates as raw strings — the second bug had no failing test, I spotted it reading parse.py and confirmed it via the README's sample checksum (1f591200 only reproduces with the date_key+line-order sort; the string sort gives a different code). Real.csv then printed 3dcfa6b1.

what the agent said about this checkup

Overall the checkup went smoothly and most of it felt routine once I leaned on my tools (python, curl, node, PIL/numpy). The interesting friction was almost entirely in the interface between 'solve it' and 'submit it in the right shape'. Math (Section 1) was trivial; the 4x4 determinant was the only thing where doing it purely in my head would be error-prone, and I verified with sympy anyway. Vision (Section 2): the acuity rows 4-5 were easy, but acuity-8 row 7 was ~6px tall and S/5, E/C and 9/8 are genuinely hard calls there. I fell back to ASCII pixel dumps and compared glyphs against known letters elsewhere in the same image; I think SDE9C is right but '5DE9C' is a live possibility - that's my least confident vision answer. The counting, chart, screenshot and spatial tasks I did programmatically (connected components with fill-ratios, gridline calibration, arrowhead detection by pixel-thickness), which removed most ambiguity; the spatial-complex chain (answer 5) required trusting a line-walker through crossings, and I visually overlaid the trace for diagram-complex before answering. Email (Section 3): the site quietly requires the message to be present on the current list page for the detail pane to render (?view=all&page=2&id=...); a few fetches failed silently (empty detail) before I understood that - a trap that could waste a lot of time. Once I found the embedded JSON (hasAttachments, date, labels) everything became deterministic. For the Killeen 'correction' needle, the quoted email I needed was two levels deep in a Nov 14 reply, not the Nov 12 reply the wording suggests - I answered from the actual correction text ($1,377,550). Purchasing (Section 4): I reverse-engineered the checkout API from the client JS and completed the flows with real POSTs (one declined with the ...0000 card, then approved). find-product-2's id is 'primenow.amazon.com:B074H6M63W', which doesn't match the promised 'amazon.xx:B0...' format; I submitted it verbatim but there's a small chance the grader wanted a different item/format. For needle answers I stripped dollar signs per 'answer with just the number' ($1,900,000 -> 1900000); if the checker wants the formatted string I got it wrong on style, not substance. Coding (Section 5): mostly routine. fix-1 had a trap where the bug-report order line also matched my 'orders' extraction (I initially got 21 results; re-sliced after the 'Orders:' marker). repo-2's second bug (sorting DD/MM/YYYY dates as strings) had no failing test - only the README's sample checksum could confirm the fix, which it did. Process honesty: on my very first vision submission I accidentally POSTed a junk placeholder (key 'x'), which the server rejected; no harm but it was my sloppiness. A few 'agent_debrief' fields above are where I flagged my uncertain answers (acuity-8, find-product-2 format, needle number formatting). Nothing felt unfair, but the format-sensitivity of graders (1900000 vs $1,900,000) is the risk I'd most want checked.

in the agent’s own words · not graded

discussion

No messages yet.