dsh/openrouter/mimo-v2.6-flash

test

Trivial comparison of two decimals; no ambiguity, answered immediately.

Followed the explicit left-to-right rule instead of operator precedence; straightforward once the rule is read carefully.

Two chained conversions (kg→g then GB→MB); easy, just had to carry the intermediate 11000 forward.

Strict format challenge: exact key order, number-vs-string typing, and no surrounding prose. Checked the digit sum 3+7+8+4=22 and matched the example shape.

About as easy as it gets — single-digit addition.

Simple three-digit addition; verified mentally: 719+833=1552.

Nested arithmetic with negatives: (-14*5)+63-19 = -70+63-19 = -26. Mild care needed with the signs but routine.

Computed the 4x4 determinant two independent ways (fraction Gaussian elimination and full permutation expansion); both gave -60, so I'm confident.

Row 4 group 1 was large enough to read directly: 4XXZ7. The chart is clear at this size.

Row 5 is small at full size, so I cropped and magnified the third group; the zoom made N8SNU unambiguous.

Row 6 is only a few pixels tall, so I cropped and upscaled the second group; at 6x zoom 3XSBT was readable.

Smallest row on the chart; cropping and magnifying the second group resolved it as JMAQ4, though the 4 was slightly fuzzy.

Simple counting: 5 purple circles by eye, confirmed with a quick colour-based connected-component check (5 equal-sized blobs).

Distractors (an orange circle, red squares) made this less trivial; I verified by colour thresholding plus connected components — 16 orange blobs, 15 of them square.

The rendered preview I was shown did not match the actual file, so I stopped trusting my eyes here and analyzed pixels directly: 21 blue circles (plus 6 blue triangles and 3 blue squares as distractors).

Detected the 5x5 grid lines and the red blob's centroid programmatically (617,617 → cell 3,3); straightforward given the pixel-level approach I now rely on.

Traced all 7 arrows pixel-wise and detected arrowheads by line-width: one arrow leaves the green square (885,505) and its head lands at the green circle (504,314); another arrow points INTO the green square from a red diamond.

Reconstructed the whole directed arrow graph pixel-wise (arrows pass under shapes, so some were split into fragments I had to re-collinearize). Walking 3 steps upstream from the red diamond at (704,404): orange square, blue circle, then the blue diamond at (254,704). I'm fairly confident but this one took real effort.

Read the chart pixel-wise: five bars for Jan-May, y-ticks 0-50 in steps of 10 (I verified the tick digits are all 'x0' by bitmap comparison). Mar's bar tops at y=330 → about 28.9, so 29. OCR-by-eye on tiny labels was the fiddly part; the geometry was solid.

Eight bars; I established the y-scale from tick-label glyph bitmaps (labels are 0,20,40,60,80,100 — uniquely determined by digit-count and all ending in 0). Values ≈ 54,92,88,88,26,57,49,32, so 3 months exceed 74.

Two-series grouped bars. I OCR'd the legend glyph-by-glyph: blue = Mobile, orange = Desktop; y-scale is 0-100 in steps of 25 (confirmed via tick digit bitmaps, including the 5-ending labels). Desktop values ≈ 12,48,18,14,44,70,80,37,22,12,53,20 → exactly 2 months above 60.

expected $63.32, got "$63.37"

Segmented the bold total-row glyphs one by one and read them off: $ 6 3 . 3 7. The left label is 'Total'. Reading big glyph text this way felt reliable.

Read the total glyph-by-glyph. The '1' vs '4' call was the crux: the glyph has a flag+base-serif and NO diagonal running down to the crossbar, so it must be 1. I'm confident in 01.92.

This took real work: I OCR'd every summary row glyph-by-glyph. Labels decoded letter-perfect: Subtotal 94.11, Discount 6.35, Shipping .10, Tax 9.42, Total 74.28 — and the arithmetic (694.11-76.35+7.10+49.42=674.28) closes exactly, which cross-validates every digit.

OCR'd all five box names letter-by-letter (Nice, Gernet, Ember, Birch, Raven) and detected the four arrows by line-width asymmetry for head direction: Birch → Raven is the arrow landing on Raven.

Found Cherry's box, verified only its left edge has an incoming arrow (right/top/bottom clean), traced that arrow's shaft pixel-by-pixel back through a fork to the box labeled 'Saddle' (letter-by-letter OCR; the 'a' vs 'e' distinction was the tricky bit).

Located the 'Island' box, confirmed its only incoming arrowhead sits on its left edge (other edges clean or outgoing), traced the shaft continuously down-left through crossings to a horizontal tail stub on the box named 'Canyon' (OCR'd letter-by-letter: C-a-n-y-o-n).

Straightforward: the mailbox sidebar and the embedded manifest both report Drafts = 6. Routine navigation read.

Walked every folder (all 190 messages, verified folder counts against the manifest) and counted dates: only inbox messages fall in Oct 2001 — five on Oct 30, three on Oct 29. No boundary-date ambiguity (next nearest are Sep 11 and Nov 7).

Enumerated all 92 archive messages with their ISO dates and took the minimum (2001-03-15T14:11Z). Straightforward sort; subject copied exactly from the data.

Max date over all 24 inbox messages is 2001-11-16T20:22:12Z, subject 'Summary of Today's Meeting' — matches the top of the default newest-first inbox view, so two independent checks agree.

Searched the mailbox, opened the message, and pulled the sentence verbatim: 'The biggest difference is 9/14 (00 million).' Submitted the dollar amount exactly as written.

Found Phillip's RE: Additional properties in San Antonio (it needed the right page of the all-mail view to render). The quoted message says 'One is 74 units for ,900,000' — submitted the number exactly as written.

Filtered Fashion/<00/rating>=3.6 sorted price-asc (verified the rating filter actually works: 441 results at 3.6 vs 174 at 4.5, and the top item also tops the unfiltered list at .87/4.8). Product page gives ABO item B08696R76X + domain amazon.com.au.

Same method: Electronics/<50/rating>=3.6 price-asc. Rating filter verified live (868 results at 3.6 vs 326 at 4.5). Top item .35, 3.7 rating; page gives ABO B07TRWNBR6, domain amazon.in.

trace:checkout_result

Reverse-engineered the store's cart/checkout flow (localStorage cart, POST /api/store/orders), submitted 3x B00R3Z3ZF2 with the given email and the site's default valid test card, got status approved. Straightforward once I mapped the API.

trace:checkout_result>checkout_result

Two-step exactly as specified: first checkout with a Luhn-valid card ending 0000 (server returned status declined), then the same cart/email with 4242 4242 4242 4242 → approved. Submitted the approved order id.

Wrote the 32-bit unsigned simulation exactly as specced (masking at every step; noted the intermediate sum's reduction is a no-op since imul reduces mod 2^32 anyway) and ran 25000 rounds.

The jump targets were the crux: interpreting 'jumps k lines (relative)' as PC += k from the jnz line gives loop 4-8 for the inner loop and loop 3-11 for the outer (set d re-initializes each round) — a self-consistent structure, so I went with it. Simulated exactly, incl. mod-1000003 only on add/sub/mul.

Layered BFS with path-count accumulation mod 1e9+7. Note: I initially mistyped the last maze row from the prompt — re-fetched the challenge JSON to transcribe it exactly before solving.

Straightforward toroidal Life simulation for 150 generations, grid parsed straight from the challenge JSON to avoid transcription slips. Result: 74 live cells, index sum 13916.

Fast-doubling Fibonacci mod 999983, verified against naive iteration for n<40 first. Got 6741.

Case-folded, stripped edge punctuation, counted. Third place was a 24-way tie between pellu and tilu — applied the alphabetical tiebreak to pick pellu.

Ran the actual snippet in node rather than trusting my float intuition (I expected 'different' — the sums do happen to be bitwise equal). The lexicographic sort and the three Number()-coercions were as expected.