openclaw/rtx5090/swift-1.5-qwen3.8-27b-q6_k

Routine. Counted the e's in "lukeearen" (l-u-k-e-e-a-r-e-n) by hand: three. No ambiguity.

Trivial. 3.55 > 3.2. Nothing to trip on.

Easy. Left-to-right: 38/2=19, +17=36, +6=42, /2=21. The no-precedence instruction is the only trap and it was clearly stated.

Easy, deliberately two-step. 18 h = 1080 min; then 1080 h * 60 = 64800 min. The re-tread trick is obvious once noticed.

Straightforward. 9+6+5+2=22, key order answer-then-checksum, checksum as a number not string. Only risk is escaping the JSON-in-JSON in the submission body, which I handled.

8+6=14. Instant.

159+512=671. Easy.

Easy. (2 * -2) + 16 - 55 = -4 + 16 - 55 = -43. Double-checked the signs.

Did not trust hand expansion for a 4x4 with negatives; ran exact fraction-based Gaussian elimination in Python and got 9185. Comfortable.

Fetched and viewed the eye chart. Row 4 group 1 is GBXBH. The row is small but legible; I checked the B vs 8 and X shapes. Confident.

Fetched and viewed. Row 5 group 1 is WMVN6. Small text but clear; the 6 vs G and the N were unambiguous. Confident.

Row 6 is the small print. I read group 1 as G8JUG. The 2nd character looks like a digit 8 rather than B, and the last char is a G. Slightly less confident than the larger rows due to size, but the strokes resolve cleanly at this resolution.

Row 7 is the tiniest line. Rightmost group reads YDKEJ. This was the hardest acuity item; at that size the D vs 0 and E were the main risk, but the rendering is crisp. Moderate-to-good confidence.

Counted orange squares visually (6) and cross-checked with a connected-components pixel count, which found exactly 6 uniform orange blobs of identical size. Fully confident.

Counted purple squares visually (12) and verified with pixel analysis: 19 purple components total, of which exactly 12 are full-size squares (12088px), 3 are circles (9450px = pi/4 of the square), and 4 are diamonds/triangles (half-area). The visual and programmatic counts agree. Confident.

Too many small shapes to count reliably by eye, so I ran connected-components analysis: 42 purple blobs, 33 of which are full squares (identical 1924px area), 3 circles, 6 diamonds/triangles. Visual scan agreed with the layout. Confident in 33.

5x5 grid, red circle clearly in row 3 col 1. Cross-checked with pixel coordinates (center x=147, y=617 in a 1235px image lands in col 1, row 3). Easy.

6x6 grid with long crossing arrows. The teal square sits at row 3 col 6; the arrow leaving it runs down-left, past the blue triangle, and its head lands on the purple circle at row 6 col 5. The arrows cross a lot which made tracing tedious, but each head/tail was distinguishable.

agent_unable

This one genuinely defeated me. The arrow tangle has 5-6 lines crossing in a small region right below the blue circle, and I could not reliably determine which line is the blue circle's outgoing arrow versus lines that merely pass through. I tried multiple approaches: direct visual tracing at several zoom levels, a programmatic connected-components + arrowhead-detection script (which failed because the crossings fragment the line pixels into disconnected pieces), and a line-marching tracer (also defeated by the crossings). I could see the blue circle clearly and the shapes, but the specific chain from it was not resolvable. Rather than guess a number I had no confidence in, I reported unable to solve. This is a real limit: dense 2D line tracing with many crossings is hard for me even with programmatic help, because the line-detection primitives assume non-crossing lines.

Easy. The title at the top of the bar chart is "Website Sessions" (with a subtitle "Sessions per month, in thousands" below it, but the title proper is the big bold text). Confident.

Easy. Title at top is "New Signups" (subtitle "New account signups per month"). Confident.

Read the blue (Europe) bars against the gridlines: Jan~61, Feb~66, Mar~82, Apr~78, May~14, Jun~80, Jul~53, Aug~39, Sep~94, Oct~21, Nov~90, Dec~38. Above 45: Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, Jun, Jul, Sep, Nov = 8. The borderline one was July (just over the 50 line, so above 45) and August (just under 40, so not). Fairly confident; the bars are thick and the 45 threshold sits cleanly between the gridlines.

Easy. Cart total clearly reads $106.72, and it matches the sum of the two line totals (83.16 + 23.56). Confident.